After being chaotic about it for a while, I have decreed that there shall exist these categories on this blog, and that each blog entry will be assigned to exactly one category:
American Buddhism
Asian Buddhism
East Asian Language and Culture
Politics
Hawaii
Other
I’m forcing a choice between Asian and American Buddhism, because we’ve all already made that choice by our birth. The American Buddhism category is where I am placing material which is critical of Asian Buddhism, as well as articles about the indigenous American product. The reason for that is that my critical attitude is a result of an American point of view about Asian Buddhism applied to people to whom it cannot belong.* If you look at the “Category Cloud” in the sidebar, which shows the relative sizes of the categories, you will see that most of what I’ve written here is non-critical material about Asian Buddhism.
However, I consider the dominance of a site called American Buddhism by material about Asian Buddhism to be inappropriate, and I will now seek to equalize these categories by adding to the American Buddhist category. But most of that will not be criticism. I feel that I’ve voiced all the criticism that is necessary. I need to survey the state of the web on American Buddhism, which I haven’t done for several years.
*An example of this is the last bilingual post. Fo Guang Shan’s liturgy is not wrong in an Asian context. What makes it wrong is its presence in America, together with unrealistic pretensions to be transmitting to the American mainstream. The only thing that can transmit is orthodox doctrine, and this just doesn’t cut it. The only kind of doctrine that can survive systematic political oppression is also orthodox, and that is what now exists on the Chinese mainland, in a vital new modern-era mainstream society form. For that reason, I find more to the issue of American Buddhism in what now exists on the Chinese mainland than in what is coming out of Taiwan, including Fo Guang Shan. Like Taiwan culture in general, Taiwan Buddhism is comparatively reactive and subjective.

Namu Amida Butsu
Xing Ping