…The embassy statement contradicted Vietnam’s description of events at Bat Nha monastery in Lam Dong province, from which followers of Zen master Thich Nhat Hanh were evicted on September 27.
Vietnam’s Foreign Ministry has said the eviction was nonviolent and that police ensured the safety of the monks and nuns. But the embassy described the expulsion of the monks as “violent” and decried the Vietnamese government’s “failure to protect them from assault.”
The embassy said the government’s actions in all three cases “contradict Vietnam’s own commitment to internationally accepted standards of human rights and the rule of law.”
Nhat Hanh is a Vietnamese born, France-based Buddhist who has popularized Buddhism in the west and sold millions of books worldwide. He was expelled from South Vietnam during the war and has lived in exile for four decades. ….
It is not simply the laws of East Asian countries, but the personal tendencies of East Asians in general, that are despotic. That is, each East Asian has an almost overwhelming tendency, from birth, to become either a despot or a passive supporter of despotism by others. This includes all East Asian Buddhists, but most especially lineage holders, who have risen to positions of social authority, not in general by recognition of their Enlightenment, but by beating themselves out on top of the fundamentally despotic societies that are theirs, by embodying the despotic tendencies and dynamics of those societies in their own cases.
Thich Nhat Hanh and his followers have proven themselves to be exceptions to this. It is unfortunate that other Asian Buddhist lineage holders, because of their own despotic tendencies, have not come out in support of him in this crisis. It is absolutely appropriate that the American ambassador has stepped in for them in this. But as Buddhists, we should not be satisfied with that. WE SHOULD HOLD EAST ASIAN BUDDHIST LINEAGE HOLDERS ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR DESPOTIC ACTIONS, AND IN THIS CASE, THEIR THOROUGHLY DESPICABLE AND THOROUGHLY DESPOTIC FAILURE TO ACT.
In general, the politics of East Asia continue to be barbaric, and East Asian Buddhists have proven themselves unable to address it effectively, with the exception of Buddhists on the Chinese mainland. The recent liberalisation of Chinese policy, as glacial as it may seem to us, is largely the result of Buddhist influence on the central government of China. At the national level, it would be appropriate to seek China’s pressure on Vietnam, in the matter of its barbaric treatment of its Buddhists.
Namu Amida Butsu
Xing Ping








