美国佛教者 The American Buddhist

July 11, 2009

The Truth Will Out

Filed under: American Buddhism — amerbud @ 15:21
Tags: , , ,


Read the whole new translation

… and in 1997 Dharma Master Yi Fa (依法法师) recieved the “Whole Country’s Ten Most Illustrious Youth” award, as the nun who had recieved the most special distinctions over the years, and in August established the International Translation Center, to translate Buddhist Scripture, in order to expand the dissemination of Socially Engaged Buddhism.

((This translating center has relied too heavily on the attainments of individuals like this nun. Historically, orthodox translations have been done by committees rather than individuals. In this case, it is undoubtedly this highly bally-hooed nun who is primarily responsible for the mistranslation of 人间佛教 as “Humanistic Buddhism.” When she did that, it had already long since been correctly translated by Thic Nhat Hanh as “Engaged Buddhism.” I have discussed why “Humanistic Buddhism” is wrong at length elsewhere. It would have been better for this nun to have listened to her elder Thic, especially since the Buddha has required nuns to take direction from the male ordained Sangha. As it is, Fo Guang Shan is now behind the massive and apparently, in its case, insuperable eight ball of not being able to correct anyone in authority no matter how wrong she may be. -xp))

编辑: 薛斐
Editor: Xue Fei

((English translation completed – xp, 11 Jul 09))

Namu Amida Butsu
Xing Ping

June 22, 2009

Leo Buscaglio, Ph. D., on Non-attachment

Filed under: American Buddhism — amerbud @ 17:57
Tags: , ,

This is from Dr. Buscaglio’s 1882 Bestseller on the principles of education, Living, Loving, & Learning*:

There is a remote place called Chayah in central Tailand near the boder of Malaysia. In the middle of a great body of water is a little island and on it it a Buddhist monastery. They have no water and must bring it in from the mainland by boat and dump it into a big rainbarrel. My Buddhist teacher there was trying to explain to me about provincialism, and he told me a beautiful story. He said, “You work very hard all day, and you come back wanting a drink of this precious water that you know you can’t waste. You open up the rainbarrel, reach in with your little scooper, and see an ant in the rainbarrel. You are furious! You say, ‘How dare you be in my rainbarrel under my tree in my shade on my island — with my water!’ And you squish the ant. Attached! Or you consider before you squish it and you say, ‘It is a very hot day, and this is the coolest place on the island. You’re not hurting my water.’ You scoop around the ant, and you drink. Unattached.” And then he said, “There is also such a thing called ‘non-attached.’ Do you know what that is? The minute you open the rainbarrel and see the ant, you don’t think about good, bad, right, wrong. You immediately feed the ant a lump of sugar.” Love! We must begin to recognize that you are the only person who can feed me the sugar I need, and I am the only person who can do the same for you.

This Buddhist teacher in Thailand was undoubtedly a Theravadin who never heard of either “Engaged” or “Humanistic” Buddhism, and what he’s talking about is simply preliminary meditation done to fruition. Say again, serenity is the first fruit of Buddhist practice, and compassion is second, on any level. These are the predictable and necessary results of Buddhist practice itself, as originally given. One can’t improve this with ideology. This is why it is futile to re-invent the wheel with fancy sectarian terminolgy. All those do is to block transmission, because the subjectivity of the transmitting culture will NEVER map completely onto the subjectivity of another culture, and what is lost in the resulting endless verbal discussion is (1) the entire force of practice, and (2) the capacity to transmit across the cultural interface.

*Leo Buscaglia, Living, Loving, & Learning Ballentine Books: NY, 1982.

Dr. Buscaglio is an excellent story-teller, and I find it amazing that his book managed to become a bestseller out from under a completely mediocre title and cover. He needs another publisher. With a title like The Coolest Place on the Island and my Piilani graphic, I think that it could be re-published, and that it would be a bestseller all over again.

Namu Amida Butsu
Xing Ping

May 25, 2009

Engaged Buddhism finally hits the English-Language Blogosphere


Arbitrary Marks

… Robert Aitken Roshi believes Buddhist social movements develop under the influence of Christianity and Western ideas and Helen Tworkov (editor of Tricycle) calls it “Protestant Buddhism.” In contrast, Robert Thurman (Columbia U) argues that Buddhism has always been socially engaged, and the Buddha’s monastic order was a “Radical social intervention”, an intentional step since his power to reform as a ruler was limited. Finally, what is probably most typical of practitioners, Thich Nhat Hanh thinks “buddhism” (with a little b) does not require an answer to the question, since activism and practice can be side by side. …

This might be the only thing that Robert Thurman has ever written or said that I can agree with. Helen Twerkov’s subjective phantasies, here and elsewhere, have been a greater disservice to American Buddhism than the words of any other Westerner. This whole article is the most intelligent discussion of Engaged Buddhism that I have ever seen, and it should be read in detail.

Thic Nhat Hanh actually has had a lot more to say about Engaged Buddhism than this, which I think is taken out of context. Thic, in fact, virtually invented this term as a translation for ren jian fo jiao(人间佛教), an idea which had been already knocking around East Asia for probably half a century before both Thic and Ven. Xing Yun. The latter, who has freely admitted that he’s not a genius about language, has mistranslated this phrase, rather regrettably I think, as “Humanistic Buddhism.” IMO, Thic’s is the right translation, and Thurman’s is the right derivation. The teaching originally given by the Buddha was already socially engaged. When South Asian elitists destroyed that orientation, the result was the Mahayana Revolution of circa the second century BC. Today’s broad Mahayana is, essentially and by definition, already socially engaged. The most pure current form of it exists on the Chinese Mainland, and one of the proofs of that is that they spend zero time talking about either “Humanistic” or “Engaged” Buddhism.

Namu Amida Butsu
Xing Ping

October 30, 2008

American Buddhists in the Presidential Race

Filed under: American Buddhism — amerbud @ 12:37
Tags: , , ,

Beliefnet: Buddhists Get Engaged in Race for President

…Whatever your political beliefs, your active, informed citizenship is part of a wise household practice,” the Buddhist leaders said.

That could be a boon for Obama. Buddhists, who form about 1 percent of the U.S. population (roughly the same as Muslims) are among the country’s most liberal religious groups, according to a survey by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. More than two-thirds said they are Democrats or lean Democratic.

The 500 members of “Buddhists for Obama” have raised more than $230,000, sponsored 1,700 events and made 26,000 calls for their candidate, according to Obama’s Web site. There’s no Buddhist group listed for Republican nominee Sen. John McCain; a request to his campaign for information went unanswered.

Several Buddhists said Obama’s message of unity accords with Dharma teachings on interconnectedness and the dangers of an us-versus-them dualism. Morever, they say, the Democrat’s background reflects the Buddha’s belief that all beings can become enlightened, regardless of race or class.

“I think his candidacy has brought to the forefront issues of multi-racial identity for U.S. citizens,” said Mushim Patricia Ikeda-Nash, a Buddhist teacher in Oakland, Calif.
That’s not to say that Buddhism is inherently liberal. A sizable minority of Buddhists — particularly Asian Americans — vote Republican, said Jeff Wilson, an assistant professor of religion at Renison College, University of Waterloo in Canada.

Venerable Vien Duc, abbot of the Auspicious Cloud Monastery in Haymarket, Va., said many of his fellow Vietnamese-Americans support the GOP because of its tough anti-communist stance during the Cold War.

“The typical Vietnamese, because they suffered with communism, don’t want anything associated with it,” he said of communism.

In Broomfield, Colo., Charles Martin, an American-Indian Buddhist Republican, said his support for McCain has everything to do with his religious practice.

“I think Buddhism is inherently rather libertarian,” said Martin.

“You examine things for yourself and finally save yourself. That leads me in general to not liking a lot of kinds of government intervention.”

Other Buddhists, however, are reluctant to translate the Dharma into a political philosophy.
“I have always found Buddhism to be a refuge from the political and social world,” said Charles Johnson, an award-winning novelist who practices Zen in Seattle.

The Rev. Danny Fisher, a Buddhist blogger from Greensboro, N.C., said his understanding of the Dharma “means doing all I can to benefit beings — hence my mindful involvement in progressive causes and social justice work. … But I recognize that other Buddhists may understand things differently.”

Robert Jones, whose recent book, “Progressive & Religious,” includes a chapter on American Buddhists, said “there’s a kind of humility built into Buddhism. They are really reticent to come out with guns blazing and proscriptions for what needs to happen.”…

In the past, Beliefnet has been a mixed blessing for American Buddhism. It invented the “racial devide” brouhaha almost single-handedly. But this article is rather balanced, I feel. Earlier in the article, which should be read in its entirety, it stated that the large majority of American Buddhists are converts in the mainstream, not immigrants. I believe that that is the first time that statement has appeared in the mainstream media.

Oh, and hey, “Engaged” is what Thic Nhat Han used to translate the same ideographic roots that Fo Guang Shan has, very ineptly, insisted on mistranslating as “humanistic.” It is time, it is high time, and it is past high time for Fo Guang Shan to get past this cultural and linguistic blind spot. The “H” word gets us into a direct ideological conflict with the Catholic Church, because of the Church’s ancient quarrel with the Humanist philosophy. “Engaged” has already taken root in the West and “Humanistic” never will. There are overwhelming reasons for this. Fo Guang Shan needs to stop trying to push the river about this.

Namu Amida Butsu
Xing Ping

Blog at WordPress.com.