美国佛教者 The American Buddhist

June 20, 2009

Civil Unrest in Iran — A Prediction (Revised)


This Iranian protest group in Paris, left, has caught the essence of the archtypal basis of the following prediction, i.e. the Earth element in Chinese pentology. Yellow is the color of the Earth element, particularly in peasant garb on a pretty woman.

This prediction is only partly based on Astrology. What it is based on is part of what the Chinese call “fate-calculation,” which is a mixture of Astrology and numeric cycles, for the same reason that Vedic astrology is such a mixture – the crude celestial positions of the planets does not completely describe their functions as archetypes.

In the Chinese Sixty Year Cycle (hereinafter “CSYC”) which is based on the position in the heavens of the planet Jupiter, last year 2008 was the year of the Earth Rat, the beginning of one of the 12-year sub-cycles of the CSYC which are each founded on one of the Chinese five elements. The Earth cycle beginning with Earth Rat was preceded by a Fire cycle beginning with Fire Rat in 1996 and ending with Fire Pig in 2007 (Fire produces Earth). In the previous CSYC this transition between the Fire sub-cycle and the Earth sub-cycle happened in 1947-1948. The second year in the new Earth sub-cycle, the year of the Earth Ox (1949, 2009), is also an explicitly Earth year, and for the processes considered here, it can be considered the Yin extension of the Yang Earth Rat year.

One of the things that these 12-year sub-cycles govern is the fundamental tone of governmental institutions. In the modern era, because our entire civilization is fire-heavy, things tend to get out of hand in the fire sub-cycle. We saw that with WWII in the previous CSYC, and with the 9-11 catastrophy and Geo. W Bush’s military adventurism secondary to it in this one. The transition to the earth sub-cycle produces the drawing down of this fire extremism to the more ordinary, relevant, and productive processes of normal life on this planet. This transition can come about by processes as peaceful as Ike’s disempowerment of the military-industrial complex circa 1948 and the election of Barak Obama in 2008. But it can also come about by processes as dramatic and violent as the final hegemony of the Communist Revolution in China in 1949, and the current unrest in Iran.

Based on all these archetypal considerations, here is my prediction for the outcome of the current political unrest in Iran: This is exactly the wrong time for the continuation in power of a fire-converted piece of work like Mr. Ahmadinejad, and his terrorized tool, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Both of these figures will lose power. Because it is a yin year, it is very likely that one or both of them will continue as empty figure-heads. But the Iranian peole will strip them of power by this unrest. The type of person who is likely to rise to power in Iran is the pragmatist former President Ayatollah Hashemi Rafsanjani.
The current opposition leader Mirhossein Mousavi may or may not succeed. But in any case, the current Iranian political system will be completely revamped to reflect the will of the Iranian people.

Iran, what used to be called Persia, is heir to the oldest literate civilization on earth, older than China. The Iranian people are a race upon which the mantle of God’s grace has long since fallen, resulting in an ancient line of Perfect Spiritual Masters, within several traditions of esotericism. When I see footage of what the Iranian people are doing today, my heart swells with pride for their spiritual power. This is from God, and against God, no one shall finally prevail, not even a corrupt Ayatollah. Allah-hu Akbar!

An enlightened government in Iran is something for which every citizen of this planet with his or her head screwed on must hope and pray. As goes Teheran, so goes the Muslim world. Iran undoubtedly has a greater geopolitical influence than any other country in the region. Greater than Egypt. Greater than Israel. Yea verily, greater than Saudi Arabia.

Namu Amida Butsu
Xing Ping, 20 Jun 09

April 28, 2009

On the Origin of Man (Revised)

Check it out:

On the Origin of Man

I wrote this some time ago. Since there has been recent traffic to it, I took another look at it, and found a lot of minor errors. I was in a high and altered state of concentration when I wrote it, with the result that the orthography was just sloppy. Since then, my practice has become such that I no longer have to alter myself to write this kind of stuff.

Namu Amida Butsu
Xing Ping

April 20, 2009

Do Buddhists Believe in God?


Check out the Tricycle Editors’ Blog.

This discussion is dragging back up all the reasons why the Buddha simply refused to discuss God: namely, it’s an endless discussion, and there are no solutions to suffering in it.

Much of the elegance and power of the Buddha’s teaching results from the fact that it skips the whole automatic (or worse, hesitating and doubtful) human transference of the causality of suffering to God, for the purpose of focusing exclusively on the issue of our suffering and its extinction.

Whether God exists or not, there is no point in blaming our suffering on Him. He doesn’t respond to that, as even died on the bone Theists will tell you. There’s also no point in having a lot of doubt about where the suffering comes from. The Buddha has instructed us to smoke out the source of it and extinguish that source.

We can end our suffering by understanding and solving the causes of it, which are indigenous to our minds. The existence, non-existence, or qualities of the Diety or dieties are simply a distraction from that project, which is the only thing that matters if you’re a practicing Buddhist.

Namu Amida Butsu
Xing Ping

October 27, 2008

On the Origin of Man

Filed under: Other — amerbud @ 09:58
Tags: , , , , ,


I’m taking a break from Chinese culture. It happens. It’s partly biographical. Check it out:

Read the whole page (completed on 30 Oct 08)

…One of my instructors at seminary would have been a Cardinal and a candidate for Pope in a healthy Church. But in its diseased state, the Catholic hierarchy had buried him at the bottom of the seminary teaching staff in the hope of shutting him up. It didn’t work. The guy was brilliant and there was no way to shut him up. He had learned Hebrew for the purpose of reading scripture, and one day, he came up with this bolt from the blue: “The Book of Genesis wasn’t written by Moses. We know that because it literally has a different God from the rest of the Pentateuch (the five Books in the Old Testament that are reputed to have been written by Moses). The word in Genesis that has been mistranslated as “God” in all English editions of the Bible is [Elohim] That word does not mean God; it is NOT identical to YAHWEH (The Name of God in the rest of the Old Testament). “Elohim” is the feminine plural of a root, [El] which does mean God, not only in Hebrew, but in all predecessors of Hebrew that we know about. What Genesis literally says is that the human race was created by a group of women, not by God (YAHWEH)!”

Namu Amida Butsu
Xing Ping

September 27, 2008

Why I Believe in God*

Filed under: American Buddhism — amerbud @ 09:29
Tags: , , ,

*God broadly concieved to include the Buddha.

Just as some scientists tell us that there is not enough time in the geologic history of the earth to account for the number of mutations that it would take to produce the human form by natural selection, so there is absolutely no mathematical process whatsoever at all that would produce the fact that I am still alive, given the innumerable moments of my experience in which the failure of any one of thousands of variables would have killed me.

Namu Amida Butsu
Xing Ping

July 2, 2008

American Buddhists Believe in God

Filed under: American Buddhism — amerbud @ 09:39
Tags: , ,


Check it out:

(American) Buddhists do believe in God

It turns out that a huge majority of American Buddhists believe in God!

It’s come a long way from the early Buddhism/Taoism BB’s when every single day was a war with Nihilist webheads trying to tell you that the Buddha was an athiest and that Buddhism forbids God.

In fact, the Buddha had no interest in God, so he refused to discuss it. Ditto war, sex and politics. But are we not supposed to believe in all that stuff, or participate in it, simply because the Buddha insisted on discussing nothing, but NOTHING, but the cessation of suffering?

Meher Baba said that Broad Buddhism is one of the “highroads to God.” End of discussion.

Namu Amida Butsu
Xing Ping

Blog at WordPress.com.