The Calcutta Telegraph, 19 Jul 09
….This is not the first time he has spoken of the need for ushering in changes for the institution of the Dalai Lama. He has often spoken of himself as the “last” of the line. “The new Dalai Lama does not necessarily have to be my own reincarnation,” he told Michael Harris Goodman, the author of The Last Dalai Lama, more than 20 years ago. He has also hinted at some new, democratic procedure to choose his successor several times in the past. His latest remarks do not elaborate on the nature of the democratic selection of his successor. He has given no hint as to whether it would be restricted to his own sect or to the entire Tibetan Buddhist community, what the electorate will be like or, most important, how he will deal with the Chinese response to such a choice. It is almost certain that China will do everything it can to scuttle the process in Tibet. …
India always has a more accurate grasp on the Dalai Lama’s significance than does China.
It’s true, the Dalai Lama has continuously been saying, in every possible kind of context, that he will not have a successor. So, then, why does the successor story never die? Because there are so many other lamas who are invested in it, is it not? It’s time for the Tibetan people to stop listening to corrupt lamas. Either the Dalai lama is real, in which case, you listen to him and do what he wants, or he is a fake, in which case you ignore him. You can’t have it both ways. You can’t, as a lama, act as if you and your buddies have the inalienable power to choose the next Dalai Lama, which means the ability to control a theocratic government from behind the scenes, when the Dalai Lama states, repeatedly and as a matter of course, that he is the last Dalai Lama. After that, it doesn’t matter who you choose to be his successor. Even if you actually succeeded in choosing the actual incarnation of Guan Yin (Chenresig), regardless of whether that choice actually was the reincarnation of the individual now known as Tensin Gyatso, your choice would not be accepted.
The tulku system, which involves choosing incarnations as infants, is broken. The most powerful and unquestionable extant tulkus, such as the American Tulku Jetsunma Ahkon Lhamo, were chosen in their maturity. Jetsunma was actually self-enlightened by the time the Nyingmapa found her. I think that’s the only way it’s going to work in the modern era, and the evidence to me is, quite frankly, that the Dalai Lama fundamentally agrees with me about this.
Namu Amida Butsu
Xing Ping
,%20Naropa%20University-large.jpg)





